State of FISA
Bad? Brilliant?
You can rate this post.
Register or login now and
tell us what you think.
All sorts of interesting developments on the FISA debate over the weekend as we swing into the next phase of the showdown. First, the New York Times blasted leading Senate Democrats in an editorial for even considering an extension of Bush's protections. It also went ahead to say what so many of us know already: the notion that amnesty for telecom companies is anything but an attempt to cover up what this administration has been up to is...well...crazy. The President contends that amnesty is necessary to get cooperation in the future, but it just doesn't pass the smell test. If the law is followed, it's not a problem. And if there's any question about legality, the time to sort it all out isn't well after the fact. That's the whole point of having a FISA court in the first place.

Call Senator Feinstein and ask her to stand with Senator Dodd against immunity

Either way, here we find ourselves. Tim Tagaris noted over at OpenLeft that President Bush will veto any temporary extension of FISA. Which means a lot of things, but the major one is that we can expect some theatrics. There's a State of the Union address coming soon, and as a result there's a full chamber of Senators in town. Including the ones with names like Clinton, McCain, and Obama. Senators like that bring cameras, and Senators like cameras.

So here are the benchmarks to be watching for. Senators Clinton and Obama will be joining with most (hopefully all) Democrats against cloture on Mitch McConnell's odious offering on FISA. That's at 4:30pm eastern and is a good start. Reid will be looking to pass a 30-day extension (the one Bush would apparently veto). For now, this is the big one.

Rubber hits the road AFTER the State of the Union when there's no fodder for the speech to be had. The President is likely to establish the framework for the rest of the week during his speech, and it's later in the week that Dodd's filibuster will likely come to a head. As a result, it will be when we get the real test of who stands where and who is willing to lead on this issue.

And yes, I'll be keeping at least one eye on Senator Feinstein there. She's been pretty willing to buy the line of crap about telecom amnesty being important, which quite frankly it isn't. When it really comes down to it, where will she be? We're gonna find out.

In the meantime, call Senator Feinstein and remind her we're paying attention.

Reader Comments
No comments have been written yet.

Community Posts

Do You Approve This Message?
Posted Oct 10, 2008 5:15pm
by Todd Beeton, Courage Campaign
Comments (0)

Story of Dwayne McKinney Undermines Rationale for Prop. 6
Posted Oct 09, 2008 12:52pm
by Elliott D. Petty
Comments (0)

Schwarzenegger Budget Deal Carries $3 Billion Deficit
Posted Oct 08, 2008 5:42pm
by Elliott D. Petty
Comments (0)

Read More >

Recent Comments

conflict of interest
Democratic Representative Mike Kernell’s son...

With the market...
With the market in shambles recently, it is becomi...

It's no secret that the...
It’s no secret that the economy is in the tr...

Payday Loan Against Politicians???
The payday loan industry has been the main target ...

Payday Loan,an ANSWER!!!
With our economy going into a slump, why is it tha...


Blog Roll


Calitics
The Bayne of Blog
California Progress Report
California Majority Report
D-Day
DailyKos Down With Tyranny
Fog City Journal
High Speed Rail Blog
Left in SF
The Liberal OC
Living in the O
Michigan Liberal
MyDD
OB Rag
San Diego Politico
Square State
Surf Putah
Sweet Melissa