Conservatives are celebrating today
|
|
| Also listed in: Courage Campaign Staff |
There have been several bittersweet anniversaries in the past week. The Tiananmen Square massacre happened on June 4 in 1989 followed by the "Unknown Rebel" on June 5 (actually my earliest political and blogging inspiration) and June 5 marked the 40th anniversary of Robert Kennedy's assassination (died June 6). Less dramatic but certainly casting a long shadow here in California is the 30th anniversary of Prop 13.
With new leadership in the legislature comes a new approach to wrangling with Prop 13's continuing impact and legacy. Courage's Julia Rosen discussed the current climate and how you can get involved earlier today:
Conservatives are celebrating today.
Yesterday was the 30th anniversary of the passage of Prop. 13, the financial strangle-hold on our government that has fueled the budget crises we continually face in California.
Get this: California Republicans are actually upset that the Democrats refused to hear a resolution to "honor" the passage of Prop. 13. In yesterday's Sacramento Bee, Republican Assemblyman Bob Huff said it was "crystal clear that Democrats in Sacramento do not wish to recognize the benefits and the legacy of [Prop 13]."
I know it is a little hard for Huff and his "Yacht Party" colleagues to understand, but Prop. 13 and its offspring are the primary reasons why we have a structural budget deficit and struggle to balance our budget even in non-recessionary periods.
Unfortunately, it will be a long-term endeavor to modify Prop. 13, which was passed in 1978 allegedly to protect homeowners from high taxes. A new Field Poll released yesterday shows that 57% of Californians approve of the measure, while just 23% oppose it. Clearly, changing public opinion on Prop 13 is not going to happen overnight. More from the Sacramento Bee:
On our Courage Campaign Conversation with them over a week ago, Speaker Karen Bass and Senator Darrell Steinberg went into much greater detail on Prop. 13 and their long and short-term goals for fixing the budget and our tax structure.
For those who were not able to join us, you can listen to an audio recording of the call on the Courage Campaign website by clicking here:
http://www.couragecampaign.org/13
Speaker Bass and Senator Steinberg know that band-aids will not solve California's budget crisis long-term. But, to eventually achieve long-term structural change, these progressive leaders need support from grassroots and netroots activists to galvanize power from outside of Sacramento.
Fixing Prop. 13 so that it protects homeowners while assuring that business pays its fair share is one of the long-term goals of the Courage Campaign, as part of a larger movement to fix the fundamental reasons why California's government is dysfunctional. It will take a strong, independent movement to change the way people think about our state government.
We can build that people-powered movement from the bottom-up, and eventually repair the damage done by Prop 13 and the right-wing over the coming years. But, to sustain our momentum, we need your long-term financial support.
Can you make a recurring contribution to the Courage Campaign today in the amount of $13 per month, so we can continue to push back on Prop 13 and the conservative "Yacht Party" values that made it possible?
Whether it's $13 -- or any amount that you can afford -- you will be making a long-term investment in California's future:
http://www.couragecampaign.org/13
Hopefully, your $13 investment in our democracy will mean that -- 30 years from today -- progressives will be the ones celebrating.
Thank you for making 2008, and the years to come, a new era for progressive politics in California.
Julia Rosen
Online Political Director
P.S. If you liked listening to the Courage Campaign Conversation with Speaker Bass and Senator Steinberg, please forward this message to your friends who may not know about these exciting new progressive leaders who will be leading our state legislature.
With new leadership in the legislature comes a new approach to wrangling with Prop 13's continuing impact and legacy. Courage's Julia Rosen discussed the current climate and how you can get involved earlier today:
Conservatives are celebrating today.
Yesterday was the 30th anniversary of the passage of Prop. 13, the financial strangle-hold on our government that has fueled the budget crises we continually face in California.
Get this: California Republicans are actually upset that the Democrats refused to hear a resolution to "honor" the passage of Prop. 13. In yesterday's Sacramento Bee, Republican Assemblyman Bob Huff said it was "crystal clear that Democrats in Sacramento do not wish to recognize the benefits and the legacy of [Prop 13]."
I know it is a little hard for Huff and his "Yacht Party" colleagues to understand, but Prop. 13 and its offspring are the primary reasons why we have a structural budget deficit and struggle to balance our budget even in non-recessionary periods.
Unfortunately, it will be a long-term endeavor to modify Prop. 13, which was passed in 1978 allegedly to protect homeowners from high taxes. A new Field Poll released yesterday shows that 57% of Californians approve of the measure, while just 23% oppose it. Clearly, changing public opinion on Prop 13 is not going to happen overnight. More from the Sacramento Bee:
Assembly Speaker Karen Bass told listeners on a recent conference call sponsored by the liberal Courage Campaign that the measure wouldn't be part of the immediate agenda for her new tax commission.
"The reason for that is that it is such a polarizing issue," Bass said.
On our Courage Campaign Conversation with them over a week ago, Speaker Karen Bass and Senator Darrell Steinberg went into much greater detail on Prop. 13 and their long and short-term goals for fixing the budget and our tax structure.
For those who were not able to join us, you can listen to an audio recording of the call on the Courage Campaign website by clicking here:
http://www.couragecampaign.org/13
Speaker Bass and Senator Steinberg know that band-aids will not solve California's budget crisis long-term. But, to eventually achieve long-term structural change, these progressive leaders need support from grassroots and netroots activists to galvanize power from outside of Sacramento.
Fixing Prop. 13 so that it protects homeowners while assuring that business pays its fair share is one of the long-term goals of the Courage Campaign, as part of a larger movement to fix the fundamental reasons why California's government is dysfunctional. It will take a strong, independent movement to change the way people think about our state government.
We can build that people-powered movement from the bottom-up, and eventually repair the damage done by Prop 13 and the right-wing over the coming years. But, to sustain our momentum, we need your long-term financial support.
Can you make a recurring contribution to the Courage Campaign today in the amount of $13 per month, so we can continue to push back on Prop 13 and the conservative "Yacht Party" values that made it possible?
Whether it's $13 -- or any amount that you can afford -- you will be making a long-term investment in California's future:
http://www.couragecampaign.org/13
Hopefully, your $13 investment in our democracy will mean that -- 30 years from today -- progressives will be the ones celebrating.
Thank you for making 2008, and the years to come, a new era for progressive politics in California.
Julia Rosen
Online Political Director
P.S. If you liked listening to the Courage Campaign Conversation with Speaker Bass and Senator Steinberg, please forward this message to your friends who may not know about these exciting new progressive leaders who will be leading our state legislature.
Prop. 13 works, plain and simple, for the people for whom it was intended to work, which are people like my family.
My parents are retired in their home that they purchased in 1962. My whole family lives near them, and all of us worked very hard and were responsible with our finances and, even though my siblings and I are all very pressed to make ends meet, we all own homes that we purchased in the last 15 years or so.
Without the protections in Prop. 13, none of us would be able to live here, nor would my parents be able to stay in their retirement home.
Your web site does not clearly state what you would change about Prop. 13. It does say you want to be "Fixing Prop. 13 so that it protects homeowners while assuring that business pays its fair share", but you don't state anywhere that I can find exactly what you would change. My siblings are all small business owners and they are struggling to stay afloat. Without the protections of Prop. 13, they would not be able to stay in business and might not even be able to afford to live here. The county would increase their taxes as much as possible, and my parents would have been forced to move years ago as their home has dramatically increased in value, as have most others in the Santa Cruz mountains.
I will not support any changes that put any more financial pressure on my family or myself. I would ask the Courage Campaign to clearly state how they would change it.
Thanks,
Rick
While many states have either income tax or property tax, the average Californian pays sales tax, income tax, property tax along with several others (car tax, alcohol and nicotine sin taxes, gas taxes, etc...). There is A LOT of revenue generated with little fiscal discipline on either side of the isle. A mandated reserve would be a great start so that during boom cycles, huge salary increases and big budget expenditures aren't passed so that when the bust cycle hits the politicians don't reach for our wallets to cover the decrease in taxes. An economics lesson on cycles / pendulums / bubbles should be a must for our elected officials...
Proposition 13 keeps property taxes manageable. Be careful that you don't alienate people who support the many wonderful causes you tackle as you'll lose me if you keep pushing to change/eliminate one of the only safety valves we citizens have in controlling the politicians from taking more money from us to cover their poor fiscal planning.